Morsels,[i] Crumbs and Fragments
By Johann Georg Hamann (d. 1788), London, 16 May 1758[ii]
John 6:12, “Gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost.”
An army of folk was fed until satisfied with excess remaining by five barley loaves of bread. This small portion served in the wilderness to the crowd was so bountiful that the number of baskets full with leftover bread was far more than what the people first received for their fill. We see precisely the same miracle of God’s blessing in the vast domain of the arts and sciences. What an enormous storehouse is required to hold the entire history of scholarship. And upon what foundation is all this knowledge based? On the same five barley loaves, the same five senses which we have been given together with irrational animals. Not only the whole warehouse of reason rests upon this foundation, but also the treasure chamber of faith. Our reason is like the blind Theban prophet who prophesized based upon the reports of his daughter that she shared with him about the flight of birds. Faith, the apostle said, comes through hearing, through hearing the word of God (Romans 10:17). The Lord said, “Go and report to John what you hear and see (Matthew 11:4).”
Man enjoys infinitely more than he needs and lays to waste infinitely more than he enjoys.[iii] What a compulsive squanderer nature must be for the sake of her children. With such modesty she adjusts the scale and ratio of our number to our needs, and calibrates her resources according to the expenditures needed to meet our hunger and to tolerate the wantonness of our desires. She must be the daughter of a Father very rich in love who is a generous friend of humanity.
Yet how far the sins of man exceed this liberality by way of his complaint over the imprisonment of the body, about the limits within which the senses restrict him, over the less than perfect light — the same light that he simultaneously damns through his insatiable yearning after the lusts of the flesh, through his factional bias for sensuous prejudices and through his pride in the very light that he belittles. The visible world may in fact seem to be a wasteland in the eyes of a created spirit destined for residence in heaven. The loaves of bread that our God has put at our disposal might well indeed appear to us unseemly and abysmal. The fish He has given us might look by our measure to be pathetically small. Nonetheless they are blessed and we are blessed for having them from the hand of an almighty, amazing and mysterious God, who we Christians call upon as our own because He has revealed Himself with greatest humility and utmost love through these very same unseemly, abysmal, and pathetically small things.
Does not our own spirit in the depths of its wretchedness betray a confirmation of its transcendent origin by its incessant effort to elevate itself as a creator over the sensuous impressions that invade it? And as spirit does it not seek to make these same impressions fertile and fruitful by building them into scaffolding suitable for climbing up into the heavens or for the making of idols? Is not our spirit always busy burning glazed bricks and collecting straw for transforming the meager offerings of the senses into such extensive bodies of wealth that in the face of such grandeur we can only step back to stare at it with utter astonishment?[iv]
Our soul is made guilty however precisely of excess in the nourishment of its powers as she exercises these through the body. In an addition to the bulk which our necessity of nature specifies to us, we should employ economic attentiveness to collect and not to complain about the crumbs escaping us in the heat of satisfying our appetites, which we fail to consider worth the effort since we always see more to consume in front of us. In this life we live off of morsels, crumbs and fragments. All our thoughts are nothing more than leftover fragments. All our knowledge is but stitched together, incomplete piecework. With God’s help it is my aim to make of the following pages a woven basket in which I may collect the fruits of my reading and reflections gathered as random and assorted thoughts.
Morsel #1
With the concept of freedom are we not giving name to sheer manifestations of self-love? This self-love is the heart of our will, from out of which springs and circulates every tendency and desire, like blood flowing through our veins. We are unable to think without our being conscious of wanting, without our consciousness to be.
The Japanese worshiper sees his idol in as intimate a relationship with his concepts and affections as the Russian does his beard and the Englishman his Magna Charta. That is why the superstitious, the serf and the republican argue with equal fury and effort for the object of their self-love, based upon a common reason of freedom and zeal for it.
Why does commerce increase the love of freedom? It does so because it increases the property of a people as well as every citizen. We love what belongs to us as our own. Freedom therefore here is nothing more than self-interest and an extended branch of self-love for our goods.
That is why there is so great a similarity between the effects of self-love and freedom. Yes, the former is the law of the latter, as Young said:
Man love thyself;
In this alone free — agents are not free.
Just as our powers of understanding have self-understanding as their object, so too do our tendencies and desires have self-love as theirs. The first is our wisdom, the last our virtue. For as long as it remains impossible for man to know himself, he remains unable to love himself. This is why only the Truth can set us free, this is the lesson[v] of heavenly wisdom, who accordingly came into the world to teach us self-understanding and self-love.
Why is it that man cannot know his own self? The cause for this must lie simply in the condition of our soul. Nature, who instructs us about the invisible realm by way of nothing more than riddles and parables, shows us through the many occasions and relations upon which our bodies depend how we may imagine the dependence of our spirit upon others spirits. Just as the body is subject to the laws of external objects – - air, the earth, the effect of other bodies; in like manner too must we conceive the life of our soul. The soul is subject to the constant influence of higher spirits, and is bound to the same. Accordingly, this indisputably makes our own sense of self so doubtful that we remain unable to recognize pr distinguish ourselves or fix for ourselves a decisive category of self.
The impossibility to know ourselves can just as well lie in the foundation of our nature as in its particular regulation and states, just as the works of a watch set into motion operate as determined by the design and conditions of its own internal fittings. If our nature depends upon the will of a great being[vi] in a specifically precise manner, it is logical to presume that one must consider the concept of this being to assist in explaining our nature and that the greater the light we are given in which to behold this being must of necessity result in our gaining greater clarity of understanding about our own nature.
Our life is the first of all our possessions and the source of our happiness.[vii] Our examining the constitution of the former gives insight into the characteristics of the latter. Our sense of happiness, contentment and well-being is a state of such insecure dependence that an infinite number of random circumstances are able to upset us and rob us of it, and we have as much power over these circumstances as any other external thing has a right to boast about having. The entire horde of hostile causes by which the bond between the soul and the body may be severed however, is subject to the sovereign rule of the one to whom we owe our debt of gratitude for having life as our first of all possessions. All secondary instruments remain under the control of His ruling hand. The state of our happiness accordingly must have this same particular basis and explanation. Therein should be noted then how necessary our sense of self is grounded in the same Creator, that we do not have it in our power to acquire self-understanding, that even to begin an attempt at circumscribing the dimensions of the self presses us into the very presence of the divine, who alone is able to determine and fully grasp the whole mystery of our being.[viii]
This first cause of all things, upon whom we so intimately and immediately depend, must be unavoidably relied upon if we want to examine and understand our own self-being, our nature, purpose and limitations. Besides knowledge of this first cause belongs the additional knowledge of all the other intermediary beings with which we are connected, through whose effect our being is helped produced or by which its state is caused to undergo change. We could call all of these factors contemplated together the state of human nature in the world. If I desire to establish the basis for my own self-being, is it enough to simply ask the question, what is man? Should I not also ask, what is the station of my own self-being? [O self, o soul] are you free or are you a slave? [O self, o soul], are you a minor, an orphan, a widow? How do you stand in the eyes of the higher being before whom you lay claim to what manner of reputation? This higher being who seeks to oppress you, who seeks to cheat you or take advantage of you, and who seeks to win you through your ignorance, uncertainty, weaknesses and foolishness?
Herein let it be realized upon how many variables our self-understanding rests, and that this knowledge remains impossible or very inaccessible or deceiving as long as it is not uncovered or has been revealed to us. We must further realize that reason[ix] is only able to grasp anything by means of analogy in order to ascertain knowledge, which is held in a very ambiguous light. Through our observations we may only formulate conjectures about the plan of divine creation and His providential rule, which apply to us in accordance with the specific design of His secret will.
Our life consists in an organization of the visible part with a higher being that we are able to infer conclusions about only by means of His effects. This arranged union is surrendered to a certain extent to our own will — and to an uncertain extent it is also subject to an innumerably large number of other random circumstances. Both of these factors, my will and the random circumstances, are subject to the sovereignty and providence of this higher being in a way that is hidden from us and impossible for us ever to grasp. It is this same higher being who has given us life and preserves our life according to His will. These thoughts and similar notions serve to point us in the proper direction to which we should turn our attention in order to secure good deductions about ourselves.
In order to make it easier for us to recognize ourselves, the reflection of each us is made visible in the mirror of our neighbor. Just as a pool of water casts back an image of my face so is my “Ich”[x] cast back to me by each person near me. In order to make as dear to me this “Ich” as my own, providence sought to combine many advantages and conveniences with being in the company of others.
God and my neighbor belong therefore to my self-understanding, to my self-love. What law! How intoxicatingly delightful is the Lawgiver who commands us to love Him with the entire heart and to lover our neighbor as we love ourselves. This is the true and only self-love of man. It is the most noble wisdom of self-understanding known by a Christian, who not only loves God as the highest, most charitable Being who alone is good and perfect but beyond this knows too that this God Himself has become his neighbor and the neighbor of all those around him in the strictest sense[xi] so that we might have every possible reason to love God and our neighbor.
Alone in Christian faith therefore it may be seen that heavenly understanding,[xii] true happiness and the most sublime freedom of human nature are joined together. Reason — spirits[xiii] — morality are the three daughters of the true doctrine of nature, which has no better source than revelation.[xiv]
Morsel #2
Should we not be terrified over the lofty standard to which our nature aspires whenever we consider it a law of our will to choose not merely the good but rather the best? The construction of every edifice is determined by its design. Is not this call of our will to choose the best itself a prophetic suggestion, indication or anticipation of the greatest happiness to which we aspire?
Morsel #3
Roman law prohibited soldiers to purchase land in any territory in which they waged war.[xv] Here we see a Roman law the lapsed Christian condemns, who, called to the campaign[xvi] in this world wants to make of himself a possessor of it. We find in the histories, laws and customs of all people what might be understood to be a sensum communem of religion [a common sense for religion]. Everything lives and is full of hints about our vocation and about the grace of God. We have an enormous advantage in learning about these things by examining on a miniature scale the influence and effects of God upon the Jewish people. In the example of the Jews God desires to explain the mystery, the methods and the laws of His wisdom and His love, to make these things known through the senses that we might transfer the application of them into our own lives, regarding other things, people and events as we observe or experience them in this world. The apostle says this explicitly to the people of Lystra, that God had given even as a good witness and a testimony of Himself to the pagans; and in what did He do this? He did good to them — He gave of Himself to them, that they might discern and recognize love and the God of love.[xvii] He gave them rain from heaven and fruitful seasons and filled their hearts with food and gladness (Acts 14:17). We obviously sees here that this rain and these fruitful seasons do not exist alone in the conditions of climate but also suggest the expression of the Spirit that conveys to us good thoughts, impulses and insights and who in such a distinguishing way was ascribed to the Jews that it was said of their women they needed His presence and support to even spin wool for the tabernacle.
If the smallest tuft of grass is proof of God’s existence, how could the least of human actions have any less significance? Have not the Scriptures chosen the most despised people, one of the least of all the peoples of the earth whose actions were most wicked, indeed the most sinful of peoples[xviii] to couch God’s providence and wisdom therein and to reveal Himself through such degradation[xix] of images?[xx] From this we realize that nature and history are the two great Commentarii — commentaries[xxi] of God’s word and, on the other hand, God’s word is the only key that opens to us an understanding to both of these commentaries. What is it those mean to say who distinguish between natural and revealed religion? If I understand the view correctly, then the difference between the two is no more than the difference between the eye of the beholder who looks at a painting without the least understanding for the medium and the art of drawing or for the story portrayed in contrast to the eye of a painter beholding the same work; or the difference between the natural sense of hearing and the musical ear. Could not the same be said of Socrates when one speaks in reference to his guardian spirit as that which is written about Peter, “not realizing what he was saying,”[xxii] or of Caiaphas who prophesied and declared divine truths without either himself or his listeners being the least aware of the fact that the Holy Spirit spoke through him.[xxiii] This same phenomenon is presented in the peculiar stories of Saul[xxiv] and Balaam; that even among idols, indeed in the very instruments of hell the revelation of God is laid before us and that He uses these things, making them like Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, His subordinate and servant.[xxv]
An English clergyman has sought primarily in natural history to introduce the anointing of grace. We lack still a Derham[xxvi] who lays bare not the God of naked reason, if I might so speak, but rather the God of the sacred writings in the kingdom of nature; who shows us that all of the treasures of nature are no more than an allegory, a mythological painting of heavenly systems — just as all events of world history are shadow images of secret deeds and revealed miracles. Jeremiah 30:20.[xxvii]
Morsel #4
No question has caused more trouble for the worldly wise than the origin of evil, or the allowance of it. God Himself has said, “I bring about evil“[xxviii] — If we had a right idea of things or sought to conceive such for our own use, then we should have no cause to be confused or make ourselves offensive through the way we express ourselves. Good and evil are really universal ideas that do no more than refer to the relation of our self to other things and how these things relate back to us, such that I say, they report to us. We are in touch therefore with other things, in this nexum — linking of all things — rests not only our true being and real nature but also every change and shading of variation of which we are capable.
It is necessary for us to have food that our lives may be personally maintained and replaced within the stream of generations. Our personal lives and all of humanity depend upon the fruit of the earth, and this to a certain extent according to the functioning of our bodies and the course of nature. Sloth is then a moral grievance and costliness is a physical one. We call both of these grievances or evil because through either of them the linkage is destroyed by which our life presence[xxix] consists and its preservation is permitted to persist.
Our health is a good that consists of a harmony of the corporal body in unity with the soul. Anything capable of ruining this or altering it is called evil.[xxx] Contrary to this, anything that can preserve or restore this harmony is called good. Our health and life can accordingly cease to be a good as soon as both infringe upon a higher order that stands in a closer relation to our spiritual nature.
Man is a very distant member in the row of created things extending from the great primordial being through whom all exists and through whose word all is sustained.
Imagine a powerful king who sacrificed a favorite of his to the fury of his courtiers that he might avenge himself through this man’s son.[xxxi] With the banishment of this child’s father the vengeance and force of his enemies suddenly recedes. His under aged son however remains in the kingdom and all fury rages around this child to torment the father twofold through wrecking vengeance upon his heir with even greater cruelty. The king discloses to this child the fate of his father, the malice, the and power and cunning of his enemies, indeed he shares a portion of the secret as to why he cannot openly declare himself for his father or for him. The king explains why he had to banish his father from the court. At the same time the king also assures the boy that he should be confident and unconcerned wherever he may wander because the king has appointed to him an unknown friend who watches over all his ways and keeps an eye on all the designs of his enemies. The king confides to the child that he wishes to affix upon him a sign that all should admire and that none would be able to extinguish, nor could he be robbed of it save by his own hand or his own will or his own disobedience and contempt for the warnings and assistance, which the king has placed at his disposal. The king tells the boy his expulsion is to be only for a short time. The king has explained to the child that he intended to have him led to his father’s unknown place of residence. Finally the king promises that after concluding some important affairs in his behalf they both would be publicly called back to his kingdom to be openly declared as the king’s friends and followers or co-regents while at that same time the king would then have executed the punishment he held in reserve for their enemies.
Let us follow the child who throughout his days is stalked by his enemies who do all they can by way of caresses and threats to succeed at sometimes making a mockery of the sign upon his forehead, or at other times tricking him into thinking of it as a stain that he should wipe away himself. At other times they promise him sweet secret delights and golden mountains to tempt him to turn to them, but of course only provided that they were able to reach so far as to make these things for him indecipherable or temporarily invisible. At all times they incessantly sought to satisfy their hunger for vengeance. While in the midst of discovering the depth of their depraved cruelty and the gravity of danger in which the child found himself the anonymous friend appears to deliver him from their grasping claws. As short as the way of exiles is matches the extent it is threatened by inner anxiety, fear and constant attack of his enemies. In every threatening situation, always at the appropriate moment his previously unknown deliverer appears to intervene preventing his being killed. Moreover, whenever the boy finds himself in the presence of this protector all images and forms of terror and danger that torment him vanish.
In order to emphasize the similarity to our condition described in the imaginary tale let us suppose that this child bears a sign on his forehead without his knowing it, and that no other hand than his own could wipe it away. It would be bound to him in such a way that he could not touch his forehead nor be swayed to do so by means of any idea without his realizing in the gesture the cause or the presence of this sign and the respect for it which his enemies must have, while too realizing all the consequences of his act should he be disobedient and attempt removing it himself.
This child now wanders — in accordance with the royal promises and commands — to the place where he shall find his father — relying upon the protection of the unknown friend he has come to trust, confident that with him he can face down all harmful danger. Along the way he has become consumed with hope, childlike love and trust, which are his pride, his desire and the earmarks of his strength.
If we conceive of all humanity and every individual person in a similar situation to that described in the story then we realize that for all of us, our life, our security and sense of certainty, and our eternal happiness all depend upon a single condition which alone is able to overcome all difficulties we encounter in this life. If we realize that by our violating this one condition we not only forfeit our happiness but also subject ourselves to a state of terrible misery in which we find ourselves suspended in constant fear, anxiety and danger, then we know we are in need of a necessary, instantaneous act of redemption if we are ever to escape being lost forever. If we saw ourselves actually living in such a predicament then the question about the origin of evil would strike us from a thoroughly unfamiliar point of view.
Morsel #5
The more I give thought to the idea of freedom, the more it seems to agree with all these same observations. I will mention two. We agree that there can be no freedom without the rule of law.[xxxii] We declare that to be a free state in which both the subjects and rulers of the realm are required to comply with the law. The force of law is grounded in the basic drive of self-love made effective by incentives for reward and by consequences of punishment. Cheap decrees of judgment are the most unsettling and the most offensive. Good law does not touch upon my own love and applies to my actions alone. This makes everyone else my equal under the same circumstances in which I find myself. An arbitrary verdict absent the authority of law imposes upon us an unjust condition of servitude, with is opposed to and resented by our sense of self-love. Good law always lets me know the consequences of my actions. That is why no power of imagination through flattery or suspicious leanings can deceive us about the justice of our rulers and judges. Indeed, the judge in a free republic demonstrates to me through his example that he is as equally subject to what the law commands as the compliance he orders of me. The judge who decides a verdict against me is subject to the very same law upon which he based his ruling to the exact same extent as I am. Herein exist all of the advantages of political freedom. Every person knows the consequences of his or her actions. No one who violates the law can escape punishment. This is the case because nothing can limit my actions save the intent of the law, and the intent of the law is as thoroughly well known to me as it is immutable. Because I understand the intent of the law as it applies to all circumstances, it serves to promote my self-preservation and support my self-love. Therefore, in our realizing this, we summon ourselves to the law and we revere it. It can be further added that the laws we issue based upon self-love never strike us as burdensome, and that the greatest privilege of free states is to be self legislative. Laws then do not limit freedom, rather they provide the wherewithal to discern circumstances and identify the courses of action that should have beneficial or unfavorable consequences for my self-love. The insight gained from good law, accordingly, influences our inclinations and affections.[xxxiii]
Similarly, on the basis of this explanation the Stoic principle that the virtuous are alone free and every villain is a slave[xxxiv] is awarded its merit. Lusts and vice hinder our insight. False judgments based upon skewed insight confuse our self-love. We lead ourselves to believe that we act in our own best interest for our good pleasure and in service to our own honor and yet nonetheless choose a means that contradicts all of these end purposes. Is this self-love? Whatever is inconsistent with self-love also cannot offer freedom.
Morsel #6
If we consider how vulnerable we are to the power and suddenness of the presence of the Spirit, whose strength and speed we can never match, we are seized with the fear that only such an exceptional danger can generate. Only then are we able to grasp why being a Christian is so vastly superior to living according to the state of being based upon a mere natural sense of self-confidence. The natural man seeks his emotional, psychological and spiritual welfare[xxxv] with constant fear and trembling.
Morsel #7
Whenever I eat too much I suffer an upset stomach. Every part of the body has its own feelings that serve as warning signals announcing a condition injurious to it — this is the body’s physical conscience.
Morsel #8
From whence comes the outlook in which functions the art of fortune telling that produces a large number of prognostications based upon nothing more than a misunderstanding of our instincts or natural reasoning. Each of us is capable of being a prophet. All phenomena[xxxvi] of nature are dreams, appearances, riddles that have their significance, their secret meaning. The books of nature and of history are nothing other than ciphers, hidden signs that have need of a decoding key. The sacred writings lay these things out to explain them, which is the intention of divine inspiration.
Morsel #9
The body is the clothing of the soul. The body covers the nakedness and shameful ignominy of the soul. The soul’s lustful yearnings and ambitions are the blame for the depraved tendencies running through the blood and running up the fevers of her body. 2. The body serves to maintain our soul in the same way that clothing protects our body against external blasts of wind and other elements. This necessity of our nature has as its charge to preserve us even while higher and lighter spirits fell without rescue of preservation.[xxxvii] The hindrances our clothing imposes upon us, which make us a bit heavier and restrict some of the movement in our members extend not only to the things of the soul’s good repute but also to the bad. How loathsome might man be if the body did not keep him in check!
Morsel #10
The general good of a state is supported by the alms of its subjects. Every fragment of diligence has been blessed of God for the general wealth and the common nourishment of all.
[i] Martin Seils, ed.,
Johann Georg Hamann, Eine Auswahl aus seinen Schriften, Entkleidung und Verklärung (Wuppertal: R. Brockhaus Verlag, 1963), pp. 69-87, trans. by mmcd
[ii] translated by mmcd, with all excesses and errors to be charged to his account. Beyond points of clarification footnotes include episodes of actuated commentary.
[iii] I trust the Magus of the North would agree that man too enjoys infinitely more than he can ever fathom.
[iv] This is so much richer in human insight than Kant’s arid and impotent conception of pure reason.
[v] Die Lehre. Pons Wörterbuch für Schule und Studium (Stuttgart, FRG: Ernst Klett Sprachen, 2003). We engineer a fork in our thinking whenever we design a point of thought from which the idea and inclination we have of truth branches away from our Lord Jesus Christ. This fork in the road of thought divides the path of orthodoxy from heresy. What is not of worship received with gratitude and sanctified by means of the word of God and prayer is sin.
[vi] If I pray to that than which I can conceive nothing greater then I commit idolatry, if I presume it exists; otherwise, I merely perform a menial mental exercise that keeps me from listening to my Lord as He speaks to me from His word and from His world. The first offering is the sin of falling away, which so easily entangles me, the second is an encumbrance to my running with endurance the race that is set before me. In either case I turn my eyes away from looking at Jesus, the Author and Finisher of our faith, who for the joy set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God (Hebrews 12:1-2). Such idolatrous prayer or vain contemplation keeps me from drawing near with confidence to the throne of grace, that I may receive mercy and may find grace to help others in time of need (Hebrews 4:16). There is a no more futile or more ugly way to waste time in life than expending effort to establish a covering law warrant for Love’s carefree giving of Self in behalf of another as only He who is love indeed has done in accordance with His self-disclosure to do: Romans 5:8.
[vii] Die Glückseeligkeit – bliss.
[viii] Thus the ancient adage, “Know Thyself,” is first deceitful, and second impossible. We are called to know ourselves before the One who knows us. If anyone supposes that he knows anything, he has not yet known as he ought to know; but if anyone loves God, he is known by Him. Knowledge without love is hypocrisy and lawlessness, as a genre of communication it is a lie. Such knowledge makes us arrogant; my trafficking in it or my affection for it demonstrates that my soul is not right within me (Habakkuk 2:4; 1 Corinthians 8:1-3).
[ix] Die Vernuft – reason, common sense.
[x] I resort to Freudian English to convey reference to the one being made in the image of God as male and female, the self or ego we grammatically locate on the social grid of communication as the first personal singular pronoun, “I,” which is the self speaking of his- or her own soul, whom God has given of His breath of life. .~ prefer the sign “.~” as a referent of my passing self that is not my own.
[xi] im strengsten Verstande, i.e., first hand experience of most pungent empathy, strongest solidarity and staunchest commitment of loyalty.
[xii] die Erkenntnis, insight, philosophical/psychological – understanding.
[xiii] Geister – could be minds or intellects: the community of human souls made in the image of God for the purpose of fellowship with Him.
[xiv] Hamann said elsewhere, God’s instruction in our sleep and through our dreams makes us wiser and happier than can the sentry of reason and all our natural abilities and good intentions.
[xv] Hamann cites L. 9.II de re militari et L.13.II eodem., about which Seils comments that Hamann was referring to the writing About the Nature of War by Roman Marcus Pocius Cato, see footnote #3, p. 86.
[xvi] To fight the good fight, for no soldier in active service entangles himself in the affairs of everyday life, so that he may please the one who enlisted him as a soldier (2 Timothy 2:4).
[xvii] Büchner confessed none have ground to complain against the damages we incur and inflict to life, or over the fact that we have not power to overturn death because none of us have suffered the pain necessary to make us eligible for receiving such an entitlement. He who has suffered most has the greatest right to complain. If He who has earned this right yields it, then He establishes a precedence He charges us to follow. Who dares claim His right, who dares over rule His precedence? So the law of sin and of death condemns us all, that we may all be set free by the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus (Romans 8:1-2).
[xviii] Most sinful because they had greatest access to the oracles of God. For who comes to know sin except through the Law (Romans 7:7fl.)? With telling, well-aimed indictment Hamann wrote elsewhere of the Jews, “In what other land lived such patriots, such passion for the homeland, and where else can boast like the land of Israel of its people harboring such a love for humanity? How is it possible to look upon the Jews without compassion? The cruelty waged against this people seems to be an indigenous part of the sins committed by pagans against them. Have we not become in fact the murderers of these lovers of humanity? Do not we Christians, who call ourselves Christian after His name, do we not exceed their obstinacy, their ingratitude and their stubbornness?” From his commentary on the Gospel according to Matthew in Sämaliche Werke, ed. by Nadler, Band I, Tagebuch eines Christen (Wien: Thomas-Morus-Press Im Verlag Herder, 1949), p. 198. I have translated Menschenfreundes as love of humanity. It was a special term of the Enlightenment era, held high on the banner of its advocates who believed their agenda promised an improved state of happiness for everyone. The term includes the notions of philanthropy and hospitality.
[xix] Die Erniedrigung. Humiliation, abasement, degradation.
[xx] Die Bilder. Images, scenes, metaphors, pictures.
[xxi] Sources of interpretation or explanation.
[xxii] Luke 9:33. Hamann’s reflection also embraces Peter’s confession of Jesus as Messiah as given to him by the Father and his expressing Satan’s desire to deceive us into setting our mind on man’s interests an not on God’s (Matthew 16:17, 23). Peter taught that that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God (2 Peter 1:20-21).
[xxiii] John 11:50-53.
[xxiv] 1 Samuel 10:5-13.
[xxv] Jeremiah 25:8-9; 27:1-8; 43:8-13. See too Isaiah 13:1-5 and Isaiah 44:24-28 & 45 fl. It is shameful that Old Testament scholars stain their holy hands by examining the entrails of pagan for clues about how to correctly handle the Scriptures rather than climb to the heights of revelation to reflect on how best to teach the church about the historiography of God’s sovereignty and providence. Natural reason can neither climb that high nor breathe at such heights. Why plaster the church’s confession with their giddy delusions or decadent distortions? This strategy of research is so bankrupt, it is like burying the Lord’s one talent in the ground for fear of Him, seeing Him from the view of His enemies.
[xxvi] William Derham, 1657-1735, published new editions of Ray’s Pysico-Theological Discourses, and The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of the Creation, both in 1713. Read from The Galileo Project, http://galileo.rice.edu/Catalog/NewFiles/derham.html. According to Bookrags.com the English naturalist and theologian was best known for his Physico-Theology (1713), which abounds in arguments from design to God, and Astro-theology (1715), which argues that Newtonian cosmology is ample evidence of God’s existence. Derham also determined the speed of sound by timing the interval between the flash and roar of a cannon fired 12 miles (19.3 km) away (1705). His value of 1142 ft/sec (348.08 m/sec) is in good agreement with the presently accepted value of 1130 ft/sec (344.4 m/sec). Read from http://www.bookrags.com/biography-william-derham-scit-041234/.
[xxvii] Hamann refers his readers to the prayer of Jeremiah beginning at verse 17and ends at verse 25, after which the Lord responds to the prophet as recorded in verses 26-44. He correctly points us to the mystery of historiography rather than the minimalist science of natural philosophy. God helps us, it is the 21st century and we still suck at the teat of Islam for our milk to nourish our apologetics for strengthening our confession of the existence of God! Such arguing cannot reach the beauty of the Trinity, nor bear witness to the revealed name of God. Who is it that overcomes the world except the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God — Jesus the Jew, the Son of God, and the Spirit is the one who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth.
[xxviii] Isaiah 45:7; Amos 3:6. The New Treasury of Scripture Knowledge, revised and expanded, ed. by Jerome H. Smith (Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1992) states, “This Hebrew word is never rendered ‘sin’; it is rendered ‘calamity in Ps 141:5; ‘adversity’ in 1 Sam 10:19; Ps 94:13; Eccl 7:14; ‘grief’ in Neh 2:10; Pro 15:10; Eccl 2:17; Jon 4:6; ‘affliction’ in Num 11:11; ‘misery’ in Eccl 8:6, besides several other renderings elsewhere” (p. 795). God inflicts calamity upon the wicked, He does not Himself commit moral evil. God is the author of vengeance to punish wickedness; He is never the author of such wickedness Himself.
[xxix] das Dasein.
[xxx] das Übel. A deplorable state of affairs, a bad thing.
[xxxi] The power to destroy death, to make death revocable, the power of the resurrection takes the story outside the bounds insisted upon by reason. Within the scope of reason the king is a cruel and capricious ruler who enjoys sadistic games. To trespass reason is to enter the arena of terror and wonder, it is to enter the temple of worship.
[xxxii] Hamann will teach those students who choose to matriculate in his stream of thought that human grievance is not the source of truth. Rosenstock-Huessy gives us a beautiful portrait of the complete Victim who alone gives this status the one voice it deserves, for God made man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. Who more than Jesus the Jew has right to speak in behalf of all humankind? To whom except him will we listen? Whoever claims to take his place is the greatest hypocrite of all. All I can add is to urge my fellow students not to be deceived into confusing lawlessness with chaos. The mark of increasing lawlessness is the rise of greater hypocrisy. The greatest hypocrite is the most lawless. What we imagine as chaos — the time of the wolves — is actually a time during which faith working through love wanes. The most godless person is the one who appears outwardly as righteous to men, but inwardly is full of hypocrisy and lawlessness (Matthew 23:28). “And because lawlessness is increased, most people’s love will grow cold (Matthew 24:12).” We are to do and observe all they tell us but not to do according to their deeds. They weigh others down with unbearable burdens and relieve none to advance themselves. They live to be noticed by others. They love honor and curry favor for garnering respect. They exalt themselves to shirk humility. Hypocrites build tombs to inter truth and adorn monuments commemorating righteousness, all the while having earned their appointed portion in the place with hypocrites where there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 24:51). Jesus brings justice for His elect who cry to Him day and night, He will not delay long over them. However, when the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on the earth (Luke 18:8)? May it be only because He has removed His own that He does not.
[xxxiii] Unsere Neigungen.
[xxxiv] Who other than those who speak arrogant words of vanity, who entice others by fleshly desires, who by appealing to sensuality promise freedom while being enslaved to corruption themselves prove the principle, for by what a man is overcome, by this he is enslaved (2 Peter 2:18-19)? Free me Lord of all vestiges of hypocrisy, cleanse me of all remaining impurities, rule over me to release me of my lawlessness. Free me Lord of those things about which I am ashamed. Everyone who commits sin is the slave to sin (John 8:34). Thus whenever I present myself to someone as a slave for obedience I am a slave of the one whom I obey, either of sin resulting in death, or obedience resulting in righteousness. O Lord you alone liberate the sinner from self inflicted slavery. Thank you Lord for the freedom of obedience from the heart to that form of teaching to which I am now committed. You have freed me from sin to make me a slave of righteousness. Lord have mercy upon the weakness of my flesh, I yearn to live my bond service to your holiness. Who are you Michael, why are you so bold to hold yourself in a bond of love? The Lord rebuke you Michael, I am one freed from sin in Christ enslaved to God, I am one who derives the benefit He allots to me resulting in sanctification with the inevitable outcome of enjoying His free gift of eternal life. I am his, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and delivered Himself up for me. May my Lord slay me before I nullify the grace of my God, as if righteousness comes through the law and Christ died for me needlessly.
[xxxv] seine Seeligkeit.
[xxxvi] Die Erscheinung means both phenomenon and vision.
[xxxvii] To our shame this actual fact provokes in us neither reflection nor gratitude. These angels sinned to be cast into hell; God has committed them to pits of darkness, reserved for judgment. Our refusal to give them thought denies us the power to foster the humility needed to even begin gaining an inkling of the reality in which we live. Father, at least cause us to pause over the phrase “suffering wrong as the wages of doing wrong” long enough to shudder in wonder if not in godly sorrow with praise and thanksgiving. Who knows the kindling temperature of the human soul? Who dares risk the touch of a mighty angel in flaming fire when sent by God to inflict vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the Gospel of our Lord Jesus? Who among us dares to publicly portray Jesus Christ as crucified knowing they will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, ruin, and loss of their souls’ well-being. Marred and lost forever and ever, banished from their Shepherd, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His might? Yes, we endure everything for the sake of the elect, but will we not weep too with great sorrow and unceasing anguish in our hearts for our lost kinsmen according to the flesh?